Wastewater treatment expert: +86-181-0655-2851 Get Expert Consultation

Equipment & Technology Guide

Looking for guides for a specific country? Browse wastewater treatment guides by country →

Constructed Wetland Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

2026 engineering reference for constructed wetland design parameters — HLR, HRT, BOD area loading, depth, vegetation, and substrate specs for industrial wastewater.

Constructed Wetland Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Constructed Wetland Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide

Published: Aug 22, 2026

How constructed wetlands work: 2026 engineering breakdown of FWS vs SSF systems, treatment mechanisms, design parameters, and industrial applications.

Constructed Wetland Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide

AOP System Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

AOP design parameters in 2026 are set by seven levers: pH, ORP, oxidant-to-COD ratio, Fe:H2O2, UV fluence, HRT and scavenger ceilings. Typical windows are pH 2.5–4 for Fenton and 7–9 for ozone or UV/H2O2, with UV fluence 30–40 mJ/cm² for micropollutants and 400–600 mJ/cm² for 90% TOC reduction. Alkalinity below 100 mg/L as CaCO3 and bromide below 50 µg/L on ozone trains keep ·OH yield and bromate under control.

AOP System Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

AOP System Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Advanced Oxidation

Published: Aug 22, 2026

An AOP system working principle is the in-situ generation of hydroxyl radicals (~2.80 V) that mineralize persistent organics after biology. Variants include UV/H2O2, UV/Persulfate, UV/Chlorine, Ozone/H2O2, and VUV, selected by UVT, pH, and target chemistry. Design locks UV dose, oxidant stoichiometry, reactor geometry, and USD/m3 plus kWh/m3 before scale-up.

AOP System Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Advanced Oxidation

MVR Evaporator Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

2026 engineering reference for MVR evaporator design parameters — vapor compression, heat transfer area, BPE/BoP, compressor duty, and TDS load sizing.

MVR Evaporator Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Decanter Centrifuge Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

Decanter centrifuge design parameters cover bowl geometry, kinematics, process setpoints, materials, and energy for horizontal scroll sludge machines. Typical duties use L/D 2.5–4, bowl speed 2,500–4,000 rpm, Δn 5–50 rpm, and G-force 1,500–4,000 g. Validated specific energy is 1.57–1.88 kWh/m³ at 15–25 m³/h with VFD back-drive recovery.

Decanter Centrifuge Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Anaerobic Digester Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

Anaerobic digester design parameters cover temperature, HRT 15–30 days, SRT 20–40 days, OLR 1–5 kg COD/m³·d for CSTR units, pH 6.8–7.4, and C/N 20–30:1. Mesophilic 35°C is the industrial default; thermophilic 55°C shortens methane yield time and supports Class A pathogen kill. Reactor choice tracks influent COD from CSTR/lagoon to UASB/EGSB, with co-digestion used to hold C/N inside the stable window.

Anaerobic Digester Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

CASS Process Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 22, 2026

Complete 2026 reference for CASS process design parameters — cycle time, HRT, SRT, MLSS, DO, BOD, COD & effluent limits for wastewater treatment plants.

CASS Process Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

CASS Process Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cyclic Activated Sludge

Published: Aug 22, 2026

CASS process working principle: continuous influent through a 5–15% biological selector, then fill, react, settle, decant, and idle in one tank with a liftable decanter. Typical municipal ranges include main-zone DO 2.0–3.0 mg/L, MLSS 2,500–5,000 mg/L, HRT 12–24 h, and SRT 10–25 d. Reference plants report CODCr removal up to 85% and BOD5 up to 95%.

CASS Process Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cyclic Activated Sludge

Oxidation Ditch SRT Design Parameters for Basin Sizing 2026

Published: Aug 21, 2026

Oxidation ditch basins are sized by solids retention time first, then MLSS, with HRT used only as a volume check. EPA 832-F-00-013 (September 2000) lists SRT at 4 to 48 or more days (12–24 days for nitrification), HRT at 6–30 hours, MLSS at 1,500–5,000 mg/L, and channel velocity at 0.25–0.35 m/s. The factsheet band of $0.66–$1.10 per liter per day is the 2000 manufacturer range for 1.0–6.8 MGD plants, not a 2026 price. Oxygen demand, RAS recycle, and MLE or cyclic nutrient options are included for basis-of-design work.

Oxidation Ditch SRT Design Parameters for Basin Sizing 2026

AAO Process Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Zone Biology

Published: Aug 21, 2026

The AAO process working principle routes wastewater through anaerobic, anoxic, and oxic zones in one sludge line, with internal recycle carrying nitrate back for denitrification and PAOs moving phosphorus into the waste sludge. A properly tuned train reaches TN below 15 mg/L and TP below 1 mg/L without chemical dosing. This 2026 engineering guide covers zone biology, design parameters, recycle ratios, effluent benchmarks, and the four failure modes that move effluent numbers.

AAO Process Working Principle: 2026 Engineering Guide to Zone Biology

IFAS Process Flow Diagram Engineering Design: 2026 Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

An IFAS process flow diagram traces seven streams — screening, primary clarification, media-filled aeration with carrier retention screens, secondary clarification with RAS/WAS, and disinfection. Key annotations: 20–40% carrier fill, MLSS 3,000–5,000 mg/L, HRT 4–8 h, DO 2–4 mg/L, and 6–10 mm retention screens. IFAS differs from MBBR by keeping the RAS loop and suspended inventory, and pairs with MBR for reuse-grade effluent.

IFAS Process Flow Diagram Engineering Design: 2026 Guide

IFAS Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

IFAS advantages and disadvantages compared to CAS, MBBR, and MBR. 2026 spec table, cost drivers, and selection framework for wastewater engineers.

IFAS Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

MABR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with PFD, Mass Balance & Design Specs

Published: Aug 21, 2026

MABR process flow diagram explained for 2026: influent pretreatment, hollow-fiber membrane module, counter-diffusion biofilm, effluent polishing, and design parameters.

MABR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with PFD, Mass Balance & Design Specs

MABR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineer's Buyer's Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

MABR (Membrane Aerated Biofilm Reactor) delivers bubble-less oxygen transfer and single-tank SND, with published savings up to 90% on aeration and up to 50% on overall plant energy versus conventional activated sludge. Pilots have reported TN below 3 mg/L and TP below 0.3 mg/L, but buyers must price fouling control, COD:N 6:1-15:1 sensitivity, higher unit CAPEX, and a commercial data horizon only since 2016.

MABR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineer's Buyer's Guide

SBR Process Flow Diagram: Stages, Equipment & Design (2026 Guide)

Published: Aug 21, 2026

SBR process flow diagram explained — fill, react, settle, decant, idle stages with equipment list, parameter table, and 2026 design tips for industrial wastewater.

SBR Process Flow Diagram: Stages, Equipment & Design (2026 Guide)

SBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

SBR advantages and disadvantages in 2026: cycle phases, CAPEX vs MBR, real effluent data, and when SBR is the wrong choice for your plant.

SBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

MBBR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with Specs, BOD Removal & Equipment Selection

Published: Aug 21, 2026

An MBBR process flow diagram for BNR service runs bar screen, grit, equalization, optional pre-anoxic, aerated carrier tank, media sieve, clarifier, disinfection, plus MLR and WAS loops. Typical aerated HRT is 3–6 h at 2–4 mg/L DO with 30–50% carrier fill. Expect >90% COD/BOD removal and >75% TN when anoxic HRT and 200–400% MLR are correctly sized.

MBBR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with Specs, BOD Removal & Equipment Selection

MBBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

MBBR advantages and disadvantages in 2026: biofilm process pros, cons, costs, and how MBBR compares to CAS and MBR for industrial wastewater projects.

MBBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

MBR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with P&ID

Published: Aug 21, 2026

MBR process flow diagram explained for 2026: influent screening, anoxic/aerobic zones, membrane tank, scouring air, permeate & sludge recycle. Includes P&ID and design equations.

MBR Process Flow Diagram: 2026 Engineering Guide with P&ID

MBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

Published: Aug 21, 2026

MBR advantages and disadvantages analyzed for 2026: effluent quality, footprint, CAPEX, fouling, energy use, and when MBR beats conventional activated sludge.

MBR Advantages and Disadvantages: 2026 Engineering Buyer's Guide

IFAS Energy Efficiency: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cut Aeration kWh

Published: Aug 21, 2026

IFAS energy efficiency explained for 2026: how hybrid biofilm-activated sludge reduces aeration kWh, BOD removal data, and design parameters engineers use.

IFAS Energy Efficiency: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cut Aeration kWh

SBR Energy Efficiency: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cut Aeration kWh

Published: Aug 20, 2026

SBR energy efficiency in 2026 is driven by the react-phase blower, which uses 50–70% of plant kWh. Lowering DO to 1.5–2.0 mg/L, intermittent aeration, and off-gas recirculation cut aeration demand. Medium-strength domestic plants at 150–400 mg/L BOD commonly reach about 0.18–0.28 kWh/m³ when intermittent cycles are tuned.

SBR Energy Efficiency: 2026 Engineering Guide to Cut Aeration kWh

MABR Working Principle: Counter-Diffusion Aerobic–Anoxic Biofilm in 2026

Published: Aug 20, 2026

How MABR works: bubble-less oxygen transfer through a gas-transfer membrane that grows a stratified biofilm carrying out COD, ammonia and simultaneous nitrification–denitrification.

MABR Working Principle: Counter-Diffusion Aerobic–Anoxic Biofilm in 2026

Granular Activated Sludge Technology: 2026 Engineering Guide

Published: Aug 20, 2026

Granular activated sludge technology in 2026: AGS mechanisms, GAC integration, MBR coupling, pilot data and industrial design parameters explained.

Granular Activated Sludge Technology: 2026 Engineering Guide

Electrodialysis for Salt Removal: 2026 Engineering Guide, Process Design & ROI

Published: Aug 20, 2026

Electrodialysis for salt removal explained: membrane types, energy use, 2026 process design parameters, and when ED beats RO in industrial wastewater applications.

Electrodialysis for Salt Removal: 2026 Engineering Guide, Process Design & ROI

Sludge Drying Technology Comparison 2026: Methods, Costs & Selection

Published: Aug 20, 2026

Compare 7 sludge drying technologies in 2026 — thermal, solar, microwave, belt, fluidized bed — with energy use, cost data, and selection criteria.

Sludge Drying Technology Comparison 2026: Methods, Costs & Selection

Struvite Recovery Reactor Design: 2026 Engineering Guide for Wastewater Plants

Published: Aug 20, 2026

Struvite recovery reactor design in 2026: reactor types, Mg:N:P stoichiometry, pH 8.5–9.5 control, scale-up parameters, and 95% P recovery benchmarks.

Struvite Recovery Reactor Design: 2026 Engineering Guide for Wastewater Plants

UASB Reactor Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Published: Aug 20, 2026

UASB reactor design parameters center on Vup 0.5–1.0 m/h, HRT 4–12 h for high-rate industrial feeds, and OLR 10–20 kg COD/m³·d at pH 6.0–8.0 and 20–38°C. COD removal in a cited trial fell from 82% at 28°C to 48% at 10°C. GSS aperture, sludge bed height, and solids pre-treatment decide whether granules stay in the reactor.

UASB Reactor Design Parameters: 2026 Engineering Reference

Biological Aerated Filter Design: 2026 Engineering Guide to BAF Process, Media & Sizing

Published: Aug 20, 2026

Biological aerated filter design covers submerged packed-bed reactors that oxidise BOD, nitrify ammonia, and capture solids in one vessel. Typical industrial envelopes use 2–6 mm media, hydraulic loading of 4–10 m/h, EBCT of 20–60 minutes, and backwash every 24–72 hours. Media class, pretreatment for TSS and FOG, and backwash air/water rates decide whether effluent COD and NH₃-N targets are met without a secondary clarifier.

Biological Aerated Filter Design: 2026 Engineering Guide to BAF Process, Media & Sizing
AI Growth
Contact
Contact Us
Call Us
+86-181-0655-2851
Email Us Get a Quote Contact Us